home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: brutus.bright.net!news
- From: stevet@bright.net (Steve Thomas)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
- Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 02:58:39 GMT
- Organization: BrightNet
- Message-ID: <4ec420$s8c@brutus.bright.net>
- References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net> <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no>
- Reply-To: stevet@bright.net
- NNTP-Posting-Host: defi1-cs-11.dial.bright.net
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- In <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no>, (balchen@sn.no (Jens Balchen Jr.))
- wrote:
- >charles stoyer <cstoyer@interpex.com> decided to share with us
- >the infinite reservoars of wisdom:
-
- >>BASIC stands for "Beginners All-purpose ? Interpretive Code"
-
- >Actually it's "Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code".
- >But VB does not deserve the name BASIC. I can't understand why
- >the stupid masses still think of VB as BASIC.
-
- Hmmm. Ya got me. Suppose it be because the V in VB stands for Visual?
-
-
-
-